Sage Brahmavadhini Gargi

 






Sage Brahmavadhini Gargi

We saw the story of Anusuya and Arundhati. (https://bharatiyastories.blogspot.com/2024/05/anusuya-and-trimurtis.html; https://bharatiyastories.blogspot.com/2024/05/arundhati.html) and Lopamudra (https://bharatiyastories.blogspot.com/2024/05/lopamudra-and-agasthya.html.)

We saw the lives of the women sages Anusuya, Aundhati and Lopamudra. Each of these women are known for their wisdom and knowledge. They were Rishipathnis but also more. That does not mean that they played second fiddle to their well known and learned husbands.

Gargi was a religious philosopher and proponent of the Vedas. She was well known during her times as a public debater on Vedic and Upanishadic concepts. Another interesting aspect of Gargi seems to be that she is mentioned as a sage in her own right and not referred to as anyone’s wife. She is believed to have remained a celibate all her life.

Who was Gargi? What do we know of her? Let us understand and celebrate this great woman.

Gargi was the daughter of Sage Vachaknu and was born in the lineage of Sage Garga (800- 500 BCE). She was named Gargi Vachaknavi in honour of her illustrious ancestors. Gargi was interested in religion, philosophy and the scriptures from a very young age. She was adept at learning and interpreting complex texts.

Gargi’s mother was worried to see her daughter get immersed in the study of religion and philosophy. She wanted her daughter to marry and set up a home like other women of her age. Gargi’s mother had also experienced first hand that too much immersion in religion and philosophy made a person very impractical in day-to-day life. (Perhaps the lady had difficulty in running the home while her husband Sage Vachaknu was pursuing philosophy and scriptures. )

 

Anyway, Gargi was quite firm in her pursuit of knowledge. She chose the difficult path of following her interests in the study of Vedic scriptures and philosophy. She was endowed with a sharp intellect and became very proficient in all the four Vedas.

Her depth of knowledge and clarity was well known amongst the scholars of her time. She was also not shy to debate her ideas on interpretations of the Vedas and Vedic philosophies with others including her male peers. Like Lopamudra she had contributed to some of the hymns of the RigVeda. Gargi’s views on philosophy are considered exalted and finds a mention in the Chandogya Upanishad.

Gargi was known as one of the Brahmavadhinis of the Vedic age. Brahmavadini is a title that was given to women who were well versed in the scriptures and were capable of defending their ideas in public debates. (On the other hand, the wife of a sage or a brahmin who supports him in his duties is called as a Sadyovadhu.)

An interesting incident in Gargi’s life finds mention in the Brhadaranya Upanishad and helps to understand the standing she had amongst her peer groups. This was the debate between Gargi and Sage Yājñavalkya.

Once Janaka, the king of Mithila was conducting a RajaSuya Yagna. During such yagnas, it was common for the king to encourage debates on religious, philosophical and dharmic matters. This helped to attract scholars from all over the land for the yagna. Such debates also helped the king to decide on certain governance matters based on multiple inputs. There was also a lot of prestige attached to these debates depending on what types of scholars attended, the depth of such discussions and the outcomes.

King Janaka himself was a philosopher king who was an ascetic and very knowledgeable in the Vedas and the scriptures. King Janaka had a very learned advisor – Sage Yangavalkya. Hence this particular debate was considered special and prestigious.

To make matters interesting and challenging, King Janaka announced a reward of 1000 cows with an additional reward of 10 Pādas (One Pādas is roughly 9 grams) of gold tied to the horns of each of these cows for the winner of the debate. So, what was the debate about? Simple.

King Janaka just said “Revered Brāhmaṇas, let him who is the best Vedic scholar among you drive these cows (home)”. The challenge was perhaps so simple that anyone and no one in that gathering can fit the description.

When the gathering was silent, Sage Yājñavalkya called one of his students and said “Take the cows home.” This indicated that he considered himself the best amongst the gathering in his knowledge of the Vedas and the other scriptures. This made the other scholars in the gathering angry. They objected to Yājñavalkya taking the cows home without a debate. Yājñavalkya said casually “I just needed the cows. But I can debate too.”

So, the debate began. First a vedic priest by name Asvala debated with Yājñavalkya. After convincingly debating with him, Yājñavalkya answered the questions raised by Artabhaga, Bhujyu, Ushasta, Kahola, Uddalaka and Vidagdha.

During the course of the debate, Gargi debated with Yājñavalkya twice. In the first round, Gargi questioned Yajnvalkya on the nature of the elements – known and unknown. (https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-brihadaranyaka-upanishad/d/doc118357.html). When Gargi pushed her question to talk about the all pervading Brahman, Yājñavalkya asked her to desist that line of questioning as it will mean questioning an entity that is beyond reason. Understanding his rationale Gargi stops the line of questioning.

Gargi questioned Yājñavalkya second time. (https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-brihadaranyaka-upanishad/d/doc118359.html ) This time she asked two questions. But, before she asked the questions, she informed the gathering that “I shall ask him two questions. If Yājñavalkya  is able to reply to these two questions, then none of you can possibly win him in his understanding of Brahman.” The gathering agreed with her.

Gargi then asked her questions of Yajnvalkya and he answered them convincingly. Gargi declared to the gathering “Revered Brāhmaṇas, listen to my words. You should consider yourselves fortunate if you can get an acknowledgement from Yājñavalkya, through salutations, by saluting him. You must never even think of defeating him, much less do it. Why? Because never shall any of you beat him, Yājñavalkya, in describing Brahman. I already said that if he answered my two questions, none could beat him. I still have the conviction that in describing Brahman he has no match.’ (Verse 3.8.12 of the Brhadaranya Upansishad)

The debate was a long one. Finally, Yājñavalkya said if the scholars still wanted to debate, he could ask them the questions and they can reply. No one volunteered. .Hence the decision of Gargi, naming Yājñavalkya as the scholar prevailed.

This interesting incident shows that (a) the dignity and decorum maintained during debates while being competitive; (b) the pursuit of knowledge and learning was the primary objective; (c) the respect for the decision of learned women who could decide on the winner of such a complex debate.

The wisdom and knowledge of Gargi and the respect she commanded amongst her peers is well established through this incident. She was known as one of the Navarathnas in the court of King Janaka.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Da.... Da..... Da

The Gods Go Hungry

Thulabhaaram - A lesson in humility - Part 2